One example of deformities these dogs could suffer from is "defects ranging from anatomical problems, like hip dysplasia, that cause chronic suffering, to impaired immune function and loss of resistance to fatal diseases like cancer"(Serpell 1). I don't think its worth having these pure bred dogs when they are at risk of this much. An example of how the AKC absurd standards is, "As written, this description seems to require breeders to select for the shortest and most deformed face and muzzle possible, and for show judges to award their highest accolades to the dogs that best exemplify this trend"(Serpell 1). This just shows how people are being pushed to have dogs that are at high health risks because of their appearance. I think that its not really that important to have a “pure bred” dog if it is going to be detrimental to its health. I think that in the case a good answer to the problem might be cloning. This would create identical dogs to the standards, but not risk the mutations of interbreeding. I think the breed standards are gross, and people should make sure their dog is healthy rather then look a certain way.
All in all, I think that people need to find another answer for pure bred dogs besides selective breeding.
Works Cited
Serpell, James. "Cross Breeding to Avoid Interbreeding." New York Times. N.p., 12 Feb. 2013. Web. 6 Mar. 2013. <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/02/12/the-ethics-of-raising-purebred-dogs/cross-breed-to-avoid-inbreeding>.
No comments:
Post a Comment